30,58 €
Voir sur AmazonÉconomisez 3,43 € (10%)Prix Amazon au 2024-03-01 00:12Les prix et la disponibilité des produits sont exacts à la date et à l'heure indiquées et peuvent changer à tout moment. Le prix et les informations de disponibilités affichés sur Amazon au moment de l'achat s'appliquent à l'achat de ce produit.
Voir sur AmazonÉconomisez 3,43 € (10%)Prix Amazon au 2024-03-01 00:12Les prix et la disponibilité des produits sont exacts à la date et à l'heure indiquées et peuvent changer à tout moment. Le prix et les informations de disponibilités affichés sur Amazon au moment de l'achat s'appliquent à l'achat de ce produit.
Évaluez ce produit
Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity
Avis (7)
14 Août 2014One Star
Too scholarly for my activist blood.
4 Janvier 2014Solid History, but Oddly Suspicious
Anyone interested in the origins of Christianity and its development into the Patristic era will, at some point, have to account for the parting of ways between Christianity and Judaism.
19 Mai 2013too complicated and academic
I Althoiugh the subject is very interesting, the book is so academic that it becomes too difficult and even boring for a normal person.
10 Septembre 2012It comes across as a discussion between college professors
There are many references to a body of knowledge that it is assumed you already have so it is not a light read.
4 Avril 2008Historical-Theoretical Masterwork
While I have no doubt that this book has ruffle a few feathers, it is ultimately a thorough work that engages with contemporary textual analysis and history in order to present a surprising, but compelling, picture of the processes through which Rabbinic Judaism is formed, processes often of a polemic nature.
2 Janvier 2008Boyarin cannot be so easily dismissed
Daniel Boyarin is a formidable scholar and while there is much to disagree with here, there can be no question that he breaks new ground with what is a significant study of that bewildering oxymoron, \"Judaeo-Christianity.
2 Janvier 2008Border Lines
Despite his thorough and painstaking research and obvious intellectual capacity, Boyarin's analysis is fundamentally flawed by four structural errors, omissions, and prejudices.